"the worst" player might win a few hands, or even beat "the best" player due to luck. They will not be able to consistently beat a better player, especially no

"the worst" player might win a few hands, or even beat "the best" player due to luck. They will not be able to consistently beat a better player, especially not professional players. That's what this AI is doing. It didn't beat them once or twice. It beat them consistently over the course of 120,000 hands in a 20 day event. Is it theoretically possible that "the worst" player could do that based entirely on luck? Sure, probably in the same realm as monkeys, typewriters, and Shakespeare.