5 ms·
That's actually a quite good website style. Very readable, loads fast, no popups and no social sharing.
by cygned 10y ago
That's actually a quite good website style.
Very readable, loads fast, no popups and no social sharing.
- tobr 10y agoI don't know, 260 characters per line isn't exactly the pinnacle of readable typography, and those screenshots become extremely confusing side by side against a white background – you can't tell where one ends and the next begins. It seems they took a cue from http://motherfuckingwebsite.com http://motherfuckingwebsite.com when they maybe should have looked at http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com instead.
- Jaruzel 10y agoSome people just don't care about how it looks as long it's readable (to a degree). If you are not doing website design as a job, and you shun frameworks, and it's just your personal bit of space, then I don't see anything wrong with doing a 'Save As...' in Word and calling it 'index.html' (for example). I too shun web-frameworks (as a hobbyist, you don't learn anything by using click-to-run frameworks), but the downside is: Is it worth spending hours cranking out a pretty layout, just for the 3 people who might accidentally read your site that month? No, not really.
- tobr 10y agoBut that's exactly what I wrote. It's not readable. It's hard to understand what these screenshots show because they appear to merge. I hoped the two links would make my point – you just need to add two or three CSS declarations to make your raw HTML look nerdy and cool instead of obstinate. This is seconds, not hours of work: add a max-width and set your images to display block, maybe with a border so I can tell where it ends.
- cygned 10y agoNice one.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]