4 ms·
Perhaps part of the problem is our desire to bundle solutions into grand theories, like supply-side economics or Marxism? I agree that we can beat a horse over
by stinkytaco 10y ago
Perhaps part of the problem is our desire to bundle solutions into grand theories, like supply-side economics or Marxism? I agree that we can beat a horse over and over again until there's nothing left to see, but small changes are how the world actually works. I can say "lowering taxes on producers of x can stimulate growth" or "increased public investment in industry y will resolve the problems it currently experiences" and those things occur all the time. But they also don't sell books.
EDIT: Perhaps a better way of stating this is our desire to package academically useful economic models into grand policy solutions.
- TeMPOraL 10y agoYes, I think it's a big part of the problem. Packaging things together and discussing them as ideologies, instead of stripping them to components and evaluating each component on its merits.
- discreteevent 10y agoThis is exactly it. It's also a good approach when constructively criticising technical solutions. But we tend to like silver bullets too much.