3 ms·
<i>, and is only considered high quality because the rest of the state of web-based email interfaces is horrible, open source shit.)</i> I take issue with this
by megablast 17y ago
<i>, and is only considered high quality because the rest of the state of web-based email interfaces is horrible, open source shit.)</i>
I take issue with this. Google is also better than non-web based email clients as well, including outlook, thunderbird and Apple mail. It searches quicker as well, which is completely unbelievable.
Sure, some things these clients do better, but for most tasks, gmail is much better. Outlook 2010, just released last week, has just started linking email conversations.
- aristoxenus 17y agoGetting further OT: I used to agree wholeheartedly with this, but have you noticed how slow Gmail is getting? I recently switched back to Apple mail, after insisting on Gmail as my frontend for years. Can't beat Google on search speed, but Apple does a fine job of that, and every other function is considerably faster.