4 ms·
It's also not consistent with binding caselaw offered by the Supreme Court. But whatever.
by monochromatic 10y ago
It's also not consistent with binding caselaw offered by the Supreme Court. But whatever.
- justin66 10y agoI'd argue that today neither organization has a view of the 2nd consistent with current case law, which is interesting. They're both advocacy organizations, among other things, so it isn't a shocking situation.