4 ms·
Glad that's working nicely for your needs. Are you happy with the display overall? I agree for the low bandwidth devices you've mentioned it's fine to hang eve
by paws 10y ago
Glad that's working nicely for your needs. Are you happy with the display overall?
I agree for the low bandwidth devices you've mentioned it's fine to hang everything off the one line. There is of course a speed hit for higher bandwidth needs[1] e.g. RAID arrays but that was true for the previous gen too.[2]
Nevertheless I still find it a shame we lost the variety of integrated ports from the previous gen. If we have to buy extra dongles anyway I'm equally ready to check out competitor panels.
AFAIK the LG 5k is the only panel offering 87W power output, right?
[1] http://appleinsider.com/articles/17/01/07/review-lg-ultrafine-5k-display-with-thunderbolt-3-for-apples-2016-macbook-pro http://appleinsider.com/articles/17/01/07/review-lg-ultrafin...
[2] http://www.macworld.com/article/1163773/storage/thunderbolt-how-devices-affect-each-other-on-a-daisy-chain.html http://www.macworld.com/article/1163773/storage/thunderbolt-...
- minimaxir 10y agoI'm pretty happy with it overall, especially with the current discount. (I do not have the connection issues mentioned in the article) Worst case for super-high-bandwidth devices you can connect directly to the laptop. (I do not have a external drive bottlenecked by the 5 Gbps limit yet, but may get an external SSD soon / eGPU once that is viable) > AFAIK the LG 5k is the only panel offering 87W power output, right? Currently, that is the case. The LG 4k only has 60W output.