3 ms·
> While I 100% agree, it should be noted that this particular RFC predates the Ed25519 RFC by some years. Sure, I'm not saying this RFC is misguided, just outd
by CiPHPerCoder 10y ago
> While I 100% agree, it should be noted that this particular RFC predates the Ed25519 RFC by some years.
Sure, I'm not saying this RFC is misguided, just outdated and people should use Curve25519 or Curve448 for their ECDH/EdDSA needs (and stop using foot-bullety ECDSA).