2 ms·
I understand where you're coming from, but don't agree. The unstructured nature of "who's hiring" and the fact that it's entangled with the other conversations
by gruseom 17y ago
I understand where you're coming from, but don't agree. The unstructured nature of "who's hiring" and the fact that it's entangled with the other conversations going on here are what makes it alive and different. Occasionally people who don't have any roots here try to make more traditional job posts, and those stand out like sore thumbs.
There are two rules to be respected. One, don't rush to systematize things, especially human things. Two, when communities spontaneously create new patterns, that's valuable and should be attended to delicately, as if one were discovering a new species.
Two companies that have done an amazing job of following spontaneous user trends are Twitter (e.g. hashtags) and Reddit (e.g. IAMA). The trick seems to be to wait a long time until the pattern is clear, then provide nonintrusive support to enhance what is already happening. The obvious temptation is to impose familiar structures (do it "right") that are foreign to the spontaneous life and end up killing what was interesting about it.
- pyre 17y agoReally, the most important things are: - Where is the company located? - Is remote work a possibility? - Is remote work only available in-country (or a select list of countries -- e.g. USA and Canada only)? - A reminder to people to make sure they have contact info somewhere (there are always a couple of posts that say 'email me' with no email address in the post or profile). These only seem to be loosely followed. If we could cement these as constant reminders / rules to the people posting jobs in the threads it would go a long way. [ It could also help to have a standard format for location. It's annoying when someone only says their company is in 'Canada' but you have to hunt down the information (i.e. company site) to realize they are not in the part of 'Canada' that you are looking for. ]