4 ms·
I have no idea, but a statistical correlation does not justify the blanket characterization made by the article, where "risk-taker" is essentially held as a syn
by aminok 10y ago
I have no idea, but a statistical correlation does not justify the blanket characterization made by the article, where "risk-taker" is essentially held as a synonym for "privileged".
- crawfordcomeaux 10y agoWhat's the harm?
- aminok 10y agoIt diminishes the accomplishments of entrepreneurs, and the sacrifices they've made. If they only have large equity stakes in the companies they founded because they're "privileged" it casts them as undeserving of the wealth they acquired.
- crawfordcomeaux 10y agoOk. And what's the harm in that?
- aminok 10y agoIsn't it self-evident? It harms their standing and reputation, in being cast as in possession of wealth they are not morally entitled to. It's defamation.
- crawfordcomeaux 10y agoPrivileged =/= undeserving Can you show an example of damage done by this sort of "defamation"?
- aminok 10y agoPrivileged clearly implies undeserving.