3 ms·
> Which of the above is the author advocating for? Exactly. The points were valid up until this point, but the question begged by the title "one percent stake
by superquest 10y ago
> Which of the above is the author advocating for?
Exactly.
The points were valid up until this point, but the question begged by the title "one percent stake" is never answered.
- robjan 10y agoPerhaps the article was created to provoke conversation about an issue, rather than to solutionise it.
- jsmeaton 10y agoI think the main point trying to be conveyed is that "risk" entitles reward is false, and that others should share in the reward. I agree in part, and that's what a decent and fair salary is for. The author puts forward similar ideas about her own company. But she's attacking a straw man. The quote specifically only discusses equity, not salary. Removing the bits about equity would lead to a better more coherent article in my opinion.
- superquest 10y agoWell it's clearly the former! But as for the latter, why do they mention their own company in a way that implies their equity policies are more enlightened if they're not "solutionising"? > I'll never have this equity policy at my company. I'll never tell someone that they deserve a less comfortable life because they have already have a less comfortable life.