You are attacking a straw man. Does an article on STDs need a hardcore porn picture? Of course not. That's not what we're talking about here, you are attacking

You are attacking a straw man. Does an article on STDs need a hardcore porn picture? Of course not. That's not what we're talking about here, you are attacking a straw man. From the article: "Sanger sent a letter to the FBI earlier this month outlining his concerns and identifying two specific Wikimedia Commons categories he believes violate federal obscenity law." "The first category, entitled “Pedophilia,” contains 25-30 explicit and detailed drawings of children performing sexual acts. The category was created three years ago. " "The second, “Lolicon,” provides cartoons similar in detail and depiction. One of the more egregious cartoons shows a rendering of a young child about to perform oral sex on a much older man." It's hard to defend that, or make it sound like it is "mundane".