It seems highly unlikely to me that Kalanick has any ability to influence Trump/Bannon's policy in this area. But I'd like to address to aside you made about "l

It seems highly unlikely to me that Kalanick has any ability to influence Trump/Bannon's policy in this area. But I'd like to address to aside you made about "legitimacy". GP talked about legitimizing policies. That is quite different than questioning the legitimacy of the electoral vote. Trump signed an order that was illegal, apparently, to lawyers and laymen alike, because it authorized revoking legal permanent residents of their right to entry into the US without due process. Federal judges have ruled this to be the case, and yet for unknown reasons certain Border Patrol/Homeland departments are defying that order (which is not in keeping with their legitimate authority). It's substantially likely to be illegal even without that exclusion because it includes discrimination based on the Christian faith of residency applicants. The Constitution is the source of the legitimacy of presidential orders, and this policy is in multiple ways incompatible with that.