Accurate and exhaustive? I suppose you could apply those words in this context but the article sets off my BS detector in a huge way, reminds me of my old home

Accurate and exhaustive? I suppose you could apply those words in this context but the article sets off my BS detector in a huge way, reminds me of my old hometown paper when their editor was insulted at some dinner the previous week. EXCLUSIVE: Shakeup at Wikipedia in Wake of Porn Purge ... oh wait it turns out that the huge shakeup was some privelege change that was done a long time ago, and some extremely mild quotes from a "source" Then we have these gems: Those images have been the subject of heated discussion within the community since their existence was revealed exclusively by FoxNews.com on April 27. ... On May 7, FoxNews.com reported exclusively that Wales had personally deleted many of the images from Wikimedia's servers ... The debate heated up when FoxNews.com began contacting high profile corporations and foundations that have donated to the Wikimedia Foundation for comment — including Google, Microsoft, Yahoo!, Best Buy, USA Networks, Craigslist, Ford Foundation and Open Society Institute. What the fuck is Fox News' problem with Wikipedia?