3 ms·
StackOverflow.com [1] I'm not certain I'd still call them a "startup" but they have been very open about their large use of .NET and the advantages it brings t
by tiffanyh 10y ago
StackOverflow.com [1]
I'm not certain I'd still call them a "startup" but they have been very open about their large use of .NET and the advantages it brings to bear.
[1] http://nickcraver.com/blog/2016/02/17/stack-overflow-the-architecture-2016-edition/ http://nickcraver.com/blog/2016/02/17/stack-overflow-the-arc...
Edit: More .NET information / usage.
[2] http://nickcraver.com/blog/2016/03/29/stack-overflow-the-hardware-2016-edition/ http://nickcraver.com/blog/2016/03/29/stack-overflow-the-har...
[3] http://nickcraver.com/blog/2016/05/03/stack-overflow-how-we-do-deployment-2016-edition/ http://nickcraver.com/blog/2016/05/03/stack-overflow-how-we-...
- caleblloyd 10y agoI'm pretty sure they use classic .NET on Windows and don't use .NET Core. It would likely be a very large effort for them to switch to .NET Core.
- sklivvz1971 10y agoI am a core dev at Stack Overflow. We do not work with .net core yet in production. That said, we do maintain a number of .net libraries, such as Dapper or miniprofiler and we ported them to .net core (or we are in the process of doing that). We are also contributing significantly, together with other community leaders, to the design and development of the .net core API. This said, we have been having some of the pain that is mentioned in other threads. The framework is still incomplete and evolving, although a lot of what's coming out is excellent and very fast/modern.