5 ms·

Libfmsynth: a C library which implements an FM synthesizer

84 points by vmorgulis 10y ago

tunesmith 10y ago
Interesting, does anyone have an idea how to start where the instructions leave off, and actually hook it up to a midi controller? What do you have to do to get it working?
- wingless 10y ago
  If LV2 plugins are anything like VSTs, you'll need to load the plugin in your audio application and route your MIDI input through that plugin. In most DAWs this is done by creating a track then assigning MIDI input and the VSTi to the track.
raphlinus 10y ago
Very cool, looks like clean code. Have you compared performance against https://github.com/google/music-synthesizer-for-android/tree/master/app/src/main/jni https://github.com/google/music-synthesizer-for-android/tree... ? I obsessed quite a bit over the NEON in that.
seertaak 10y ago
This is really impressive. Thanks for sharing.
w0utert 10y ago
Pretty awesome, I've always wanted to make something like this myself, but listening to the demo on SoundCloud I don't think I would never even get close to this :-) One question I have is how difficult it would be to adapt a soft synth like this to also be able to produce the kinds of sounds you would get from a SID (from the C64 etc). My understanding of waveform synth is very limited, but it has always struck me how different all synthesizers (hardware and software) always sounded so different from SID chiptunes. Probably there's some analog effects going on there that are hard to reproduce mathematically?
- exDM69 10y ago
  > Probably there's some analog effects going on there that are hard to reproduce mathematically? Yes, exactly. The SID chip is a pretty complex analog synthesizer and it was made using less-than-perfect manufacturing processes, making some chips sound better than others. The SID has very nice analog filters that are not trivial to emulate with digital signal processing. Additionally, there were lots of ugly tricks that abused the SID chip, such as making sounds by emitting a "all ones" full-blast signal and then cranking the volume of the mixer circuit up and down to produce a fake pcm sound. My best understanding is that a "normal" audio synthesizer (such as this one I believe) is doing computation at the same rate as audio output rate (typically 44 or 48 kHz). SID software emulators run internally at a much higher sample rate (hundreds of kHz) in order to emulate the analog circuitry.
  - iammyIP 10y ago
    The sid is not a complex analog synth, it's a digital 3 poly 8 bit synth with a single analog Filter at the end of the chain. As of synthesizer architecture the sid is extremely simple and genius in design, like a skateboard many tricks are possible with a simple thing.
    - exDM69 10y ago
      The complexity (emulation-wise) comes from the fact that it has analog circuitry and has manufacturing imperfections. It's not complex compared to a analog modular synth setup, of course. Emulating it digitally is not just a matter of replicating the functionality of the circuitry, but also taking in account all the analog phenomena. It's much easier to model something like a Yamaha-style FM chip you can find in AdLib or early SoundBlaster cards.
      - iammyIP 10y ago
        yes of course, to approximate the analog filter in digital you need to calculate some nonlinearities, and could aswell go so far as simulate electric circuitry to such detail that you would need a supercomputer to run it. But that's not the complexity of the synth architecture (which is low on the sid), but the default complexity of simulating anything analog.
exDM69 10y ago
Just as a point of comparison, here's an FM/AM modulated synth I wrote some years ago [0]. The version linked here is written in 250 lines of plain old C code with floating point arithmetic and not a single thought has given to performance (but it runs fast enough). Originally, this synth was designed for a demoscene 4k intro, which was never finished. It was originally implemented with 16.16 fixed point arithmetic using legacy x86 assembly abusing one byte instruction encodings (e.g. using the AX part of RAX as the .16 fractional part). Some of the design decisions of the size-optimized hand-written assembly synth are still visible in the original code. The original assembly implementation is buried somewhere deep in my hard disk. [0] https://github.com/rikusalminen/jamtoysynth/blob/master/src/instrument.c https://github.com/rikusalminen/jamtoysynth/blob/master/src/...
- thedjinn 10y ago
  Always interesting to see this. Looks a lot like a 4k synth I did myself many years ago. It also amuses me to see that almost everybody was using those RBJ biquad filters.
  - exDM69 10y ago
    I have to confess that I have pretty much no idea how the filter works or the math behind it. I wrote that part with a friend who has some DSP background but it was essentially copied from a signal processing book :) But it sounds alright and was easy to implement, I can see why it's popular.

84 points by vmorgulis 10y ago

Interesting, does anyone have an idea how to start where the instructions leave off, and actually hook it up to a midi controller? What do you have to do to get it working?

wingless 10y ago
If LV2 plugins are anything like VSTs, you'll need to load the plugin in your audio application and route your MIDI input through that plugin. In most DAWs this is done by creating a track then assigning MIDI input and the VSTi to the track.

raphlinus 10y ago

Very cool, looks like clean code. Have you compared performance against https://github.com/google/music-synthesizer-for-android/tree/master/app/src/main/jni https://github.com/google/music-synthesizer-for-android/tree... ? I obsessed quite a bit over the NEON in that.

seertaak 10y ago

This is really impressive. Thanks for sharing.

w0utert 10y ago

Pretty awesome, I've always wanted to make something like this myself, but listening to the demo on SoundCloud I don't think I would never even get close to this :-) One question I have is how difficult it would be to adapt a soft synth like this to also be able to produce the kinds of sounds you would get from a SID (from the C64 etc). My understanding of waveform synth is very limited, but it has always struck me how different all synthesizers (hardware and software) always sounded so different from SID chiptunes. Probably there's some analog effects going on there that are hard to reproduce mathematically?

exDM69 10y ago
> Probably there's some analog effects going on there that are hard to reproduce mathematically? Yes, exactly. The SID chip is a pretty complex analog synthesizer and it was made using less-than-perfect manufacturing processes, making some chips sound better than others. The SID has very nice analog filters that are not trivial to emulate with digital signal processing. Additionally, there were lots of ugly tricks that abused the SID chip, such as making sounds by emitting a "all ones" full-blast signal and then cranking the volume of the mixer circuit up and down to produce a fake pcm sound. My best understanding is that a "normal" audio synthesizer (such as this one I believe) is doing computation at the same rate as audio output rate (typically 44 or 48 kHz). SID software emulators run internally at a much higher sample rate (hundreds of kHz) in order to emulate the analog circuitry.
- iammyIP 10y ago
  The sid is not a complex analog synth, it's a digital 3 poly 8 bit synth with a single analog Filter at the end of the chain. As of synthesizer architecture the sid is extremely simple and genius in design, like a skateboard many tricks are possible with a simple thing.
  - exDM69 10y ago
    The complexity (emulation-wise) comes from the fact that it has analog circuitry and has manufacturing imperfections. It's not complex compared to a analog modular synth setup, of course. Emulating it digitally is not just a matter of replicating the functionality of the circuitry, but also taking in account all the analog phenomena. It's much easier to model something like a Yamaha-style FM chip you can find in AdLib or early SoundBlaster cards.
    - iammyIP 10y ago
      yes of course, to approximate the analog filter in digital you need to calculate some nonlinearities, and could aswell go so far as simulate electric circuitry to such detail that you would need a supercomputer to run it. But that's not the complexity of the synth architecture (which is low on the sid), but the default complexity of simulating anything analog.

exDM69 10y ago

Just as a point of comparison, here's an FM/AM modulated synth I wrote some years ago [0]. The version linked here is written in 250 lines of plain old C code with floating point arithmetic and not a single thought has given to performance (but it runs fast enough). Originally, this synth was designed for a demoscene 4k intro, which was never finished. It was originally implemented with 16.16 fixed point arithmetic using legacy x86 assembly abusing one byte instruction encodings (e.g. using the AX part of RAX as the .16 fractional part). Some of the design decisions of the size-optimized hand-written assembly synth are still visible in the original code. The original assembly implementation is buried somewhere deep in my hard disk. [0] https://github.com/rikusalminen/jamtoysynth/blob/master/src/instrument.c https://github.com/rikusalminen/jamtoysynth/blob/master/src/...

thedjinn 10y ago
Always interesting to see this. Looks a lot like a 4k synth I did myself many years ago. It also amuses me to see that almost everybody was using those RBJ biquad filters.
- exDM69 10y ago
  I have to confess that I have pretty much no idea how the filter works or the math behind it. I wrote that part with a friend who has some DSP background but it was essentially copied from a signal processing book :) But it sounds alright and was easy to implement, I can see why it's popular.