with regards to being anti-union it merely highlights that the industry is artificially labor intensive in a day when it should not be. similar to how newspaper

with regards to being anti-union it merely highlights that the industry is artificially labor intensive in a day when it should not be. similar to how newspapers were chock full of people who were very limited in scope but wholly protected. the negative about unions is that protecting an overly narrow just eventually leads to loss of not only that job but supporting jobs as well. the only "industry" protected from this loss potential is within the realm of government employment especially in maintenance categories. hollywood was able to hide such largess when the money was flowing but this is low hanging fruit to pick on, the salaries of actors and actresses is where many need to go but are afraid to call out. People compare CEO to line employee pay all the time but compare the lead actor(s) to the set people, never.