4 ms·
The GOP had a ton of dirt on Sanders that they never used. If they had, he likely would have done much worse than Clinton. http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/
by dankohn1 10y ago
The GOP had a ton of dirt on Sanders that they never used. If they had, he likely would have done much worse than Clinton. http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/12/the-2016-election-is-a-disaster-without-a-moral.html http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/12/the-2016-electi...
- oelang 10y agoHow could that dirt be worse than what we have/had on Trump? Does it even matter?
- dankohn1 10y agoThe question (and it's obviously an Earth-2 counterfactual), is how the dirt on Sanders would have compared to the email server calumny on Clinton. Anyway, my whole theory of the election is that since they turned on the Large Hadron Collider we've been living in one of the "bad" multiverses.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- nicolas_t 10y agoThat was a very informative article. Thanks. I'm still not sure how bad it would have looked like compared to Hillary's email server but that article makes a good argument that Sanders wouldn't have been a guaranteed win.