> At one point after days of training, my agent actually had a 90% LOSE rate against an opponent that played totally randomly. To this day I am baffled by this.

> At one point after days of training, my agent actually had a 90% LOSE rate against an opponent that played totally randomly. To this day I am baffled by this. This is indeed baffling. My best guess: perhaps your error function was reversed? Getting to 90% loss sounds like it would require training.