It's important to distinguish speaking officially on behalf of a corporate entity, as opposed to speaking individually or on behalf of a group of people. I don

It's important to distinguish speaking officially on behalf of a corporate entity, as opposed to speaking individually or on behalf of a group of people. I don't think there's any problem with a corporate entity having an official stance on an issue; some issues directly impact the running of companies. I feel it's crucial that if founders want to voice some form of political / social / religious / divisive opinion, they choose their language very carefully as to avoid misrepresenting others.