I always liked the Boost model (if I'm thinking of the right library), where things aren't just open source, but where there's some expectation of active peer r

I always liked the Boost model (if I'm thinking of the right library), where things aren't just open source, but where there's some expectation of active peer review. I'm not sure how to incentivize peer review, but that seems like the right solution: to not only put out code that's openly reviewable, but where you create some incentive for people to review it. Maybe that's the point of paid third-party audits, or rewards for identifying bugs, but maybe there's some other options that could be encouraged more?