3 ms·
" It's only had a couple of brief downtimes in the many years I've used it, and no spam has ever gotten through." Appreciate the feedback. Looking more and mor
by nickpsecurity 10y ago
" It's only had a couple of brief downtimes in the many years I've used it, and no spam has ever gotten through."
Appreciate the feedback. Looking more and more like what I'll switch to as interim solution.
"For anything really sensitive, I'd prefer non-digital, more traditional and primitive means of communication."
This is what high-security engineer Clive Robinson and I been recommending for years now. The only exception is one-time pads on air-gapped machines if you can exchange and protect the pads. The OTP version of Tinfoil Chat combined with that would have very, strong INFOSEC. Still prefer personal communications or messages through trusted people.
Note: The elites that scheme against us all have kept their secrets using couriers and physical meetings with people of aligned incentives. Most effective model of private communication in history. Add bug sweeps or other mitigations these days.
- pmoriarty 10y agoIt doesn't have to involve physical meetings. If you look at the history of pre-electronic secret communication, I think many of those methods could still be very effective -- as long as you haven't been singled out for surveillance by a powerful adversary, of course. I'm talking about security for ordinary, privacy-conscious people here.