4 ms·
I've seen it many times, particularly in finance which still has plenty of VT100 applications. The reason is that once you know the codes, you can navigate and
by jwilliams 10y ago
I've seen it many times, particularly in finance which still has plenty of VT100 applications.
The reason is that once you know the codes, you can navigate and enter data at a genuinely incredible rate. If you've ever watched an experienced operator on one of these applications you'd be amazed. For one loan processing application, the terminal was an order of magnitude faster than the Web-based interface that was being deployed.
The key here though, is "experienced". This is someone who has developed the knowledge and muscle-memory to operate at that speed. This also makes the system more brittle (and often harder to change). Critically, it also means it takes a lot of training and time for people to be productive.
The reason many big organizations dropped the terminals - they wanted to be able to train people quicker, not because it was more productive.
- coldtea 10y ago>The key here though, is "experienced". The other key is that those people and those "POS" style apps do very little things -- mostly a single task like e.g. bank accounts management.
- jwilliams 10y agoThe example I put in there was loan applications, which are quite complex. Loan origination (especially Business Loans) is perhaps the most complex business process I've ever encountered.
- sperglord 10y agoI call this "the Dwarf Fortress UI paradigm." Yes, it's very fast to someone experienced with it. Yes, the learning curve is incredible. No, it will never change because the stakeholder (ie. the developer) is happy with it.