4 ms·
> On the other hand, it also leaves you wondering just how willing to step outside their own pre-existing biases these people are? If (as is true in cases like
by lutusp 10y ago
> On the other hand, it also leaves you wondering just how willing to step outside their own pre-existing biases these people are?
If (as is true in cases like this one) a large database of solved cases reveal that the crimes are often self-inflicted, then it's not bias, it's common sense and the dispassionate result of statistical analysis.
Consider the murder of marriage partners -- in very many cases, the perpetrator is the other marriage partner, and that's the first person investigated. Is that bias, or common sense?
"Over 71% of Wives Kill Their Husbands" : https://rmaxgenactivepua.wordpress.com/2013/07/19/over-71-of-wives-kill-their-husbands-stats-we-have-to-take-notice-of/ https://rmaxgenactivepua.wordpress.com/2013/07/19/over-71-of...
(The title is somewhat misleading -- it means that, when a husband is murdered, in 71% of cases, the perpetrator is the partner.)
- brontosnorous 10y agoOr perhaps: 71% or married men, who are murdered, are found to have been killed by their spouses.
- emeraldd 10y agoTrue, the point where it becomes bias in my mind is when they decide that the assumption is true and don't look further than the first guess.
- somestag 10y agoYes, this is definitely the true issue. Suspect whomever you want; carry out your investigation with an open mind regardless. To disregard a pattern is stupidity, but to enslave yourself to it is laziness.
- emeraldd 10y ago> To disregard a pattern is stupidity, but to enslave yourself to it is laziness. I may have to quote you on that one ;)