6 ms·
Here's the great & intense statement from the New York Taxi Workers Alliance on their JFK strike: "NYTWA STATEMENT ON MUSLIM BAN: Professional drivers are ove
by mozumder 10y ago
Here's the great & intense statement from the New York Taxi Workers Alliance on their JFK strike:
"NYTWA STATEMENT ON MUSLIM BAN:
Professional drivers are over 20 times more likely to be murdered on the job than other workers. By sanctioning bigotry with his unconstitutional and inhumane executive order banning Muslim refugees from seven countries, the president is putting professional drivers in more danger than they have been in any time since 9/11 when hate crimes against immigrants skyrocketed.
Our 19,000-member-strong union stands firmly opposed to Donald Trump's Muslim ban. As an organization whose membership is largely Muslim, a workforce that's almost universally immigrant, and a working-class movement that is rooted in the defense of the oppressed, we say no to this inhumane and unconstitutional ban.
We know all too well that when government programs sanction outright Islamophobia, and the rhetoric of hate is spewed from the bully pulpit, hate crimes increase and drivers suffer gravely. Our Sikh and other non-Muslim brown and black members also suffer from anti-Muslim violence.
Today, drivers are joining the protest at JFK Airport in support of all those who are currently being detained at the airport because of Trump's unconstitutional executive order. Drivers stand in solidarity with refugees coming to America in search of peace and safety and with those who are simply trying to return to their homes here in America after traveling abroad. We stand in solidarity with all of our peace-loving neighbors against this inhumane, cruel, and unconstitutional act of pure bigotry."
From: https://www.facebook.com/nytwa/posts/1562624543751719 https://www.facebook.com/nytwa/posts/1562624543751719
- justinpombrio 10y agoI hate asking about downvotes, but I'm really confused why this comment has been pushed to the bottom. Why?
- jakeogh 10y agoWell, it's not a "Muslim Ban" for starters. Look up the countries with the highest Muslim populations, then cross ref to the list of countries that have a 90 day (to start) ban.
- 3JPLW 10y agoIt's a Muslim ban when it affects majority-Muslim countries and has a minority exemption. That's pretty clear to me.
- jakeogh 10y agoThe top 6 countries [1] with the highest Muslim populations are not (temp) banned, yet somehow it's a "Muslim Ban". [1] http://www.pewforum.org/2015/04/02/muslims/pf_15-04-02_projectionstables74/ http://www.pewforum.org/2015/04/02/muslims/pf_15-04-02_proje...
- tacomonstrous 10y agoThis is semantics. It was imposed with the intention of being a Muslim ban, but with plausible deniability. See Giuliani's comments here: http://nypost.com/2017/01/29/trump-asked-me-how-to-legally-create-muslim-ban-giuliani/ http://nypost.com/2017/01/29/trump-asked-me-how-to-legally-c...
- 551199 10y agoDHS picked the countries to ban when Obama was still the President[0]. I'm being flagged for stating the inconvenient truth that this isn't 'muslim ban'. Most muslim countries aren't even affected. [0]https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/02/18/dhs-announces-further-travel-restrictions-visa-waiver-program https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/02/18/dhs-announces-further-tr...
- tacomonstrous 10y agoAre you saying that Giuliani is lying?
- 551199 10y agoAre you saying Obama wanted a muslim ban? Most muslim countries aren't even affected so if you read it's a muslim ban you have been reading fake news.