4 ms·

Er, surely you meant: https://graph.facebook.com/search?q=%22slept%20with%22&type=post https://graph.facebook.com/search?q=%22slept%20with%22&t...

by zach 16y ago

jrockway 16y ago
Indeed. This one was pretty good: { "id": "709527250_127568693924655", "from": { "name": "Heather Smith Kiessling", "id": "709527250" }, "message": "never going home to doug he is nothing more than a wife beating raping cheeting asshole who fucked my gay friend in the same bed he slept with me in. plus kept my dildo and wouldnt let me have it hhhhmmm yeah wonder where he sticking that at? sry i ever snuck you in to justin an megs house this last tuseday and fucked you and let you tell me you wanted me to have you baby.", "type": "status", "created_time": "2010-05-16T05:15:18+0000", "updated_time": "2010-05-16T05:15:31+0000" },
- natrius 16y ago
  Most people would consider that oversharing even among friends, so I don't think this is a privacy settings issue. I'm sure there are plenty of blog posts with the same kind of content, and there was never any semblance of privacy there. You can't pick a couple of potentially embarrassing posts and conclude that Facebook has misled a large portion of its userbase. Some people make bad choices.
  - jrockway 16y ago
    People will always make bad choices. Good tools help reduce the damage those bad choices cause.
    - natrius 16y ago
      I don't know of any similar tool that would prevent this example.
      - jrockway 16y ago
        I shouldn't be able to see this, as I have no idea who this person is. If she only shared it with her closest friends, the damage would have been more localized.
natrius 16y ago
Yes, I did. I don't see any incriminating posts there. A few are borderline, but they seem to be calling out other people for cheating, not talking about their own escapades. In that case, privacy isn't the point.

Er, surely you meant: https://graph.facebook.com/search?q=%22slept%20with%22&type=post https://graph.facebook.com/search?q=%22slept%20with%22&t...

by zach 16y ago

Er, surely you meant: https://graph.facebook.com/search?q=%22slept%20with%22&type=post https://graph.facebook.com/search?q=%22slept%20with%22&t...

jrockway 16y ago

Indeed. This one was pretty good: { "id": "709527250_127568693924655", "from": { "name": "Heather Smith Kiessling", "id": "709527250" }, "message": "never going home to doug he is nothing more than a wife beating raping cheeting asshole who fucked my gay friend in the same bed he slept with me in. plus kept my dildo and wouldnt let me have it hhhhmmm yeah wonder where he sticking that at? sry i ever snuck you in to justin an megs house this last tuseday and fucked you and let you tell me you wanted me to have you baby.", "type": "status", "created_time": "2010-05-16T05:15:18+0000", "updated_time": "2010-05-16T05:15:31+0000" },

natrius 16y ago
Most people would consider that oversharing even among friends, so I don't think this is a privacy settings issue. I'm sure there are plenty of blog posts with the same kind of content, and there was never any semblance of privacy there. You can't pick a couple of potentially embarrassing posts and conclude that Facebook has misled a large portion of its userbase. Some people make bad choices.
- jrockway 16y ago
  People will always make bad choices. Good tools help reduce the damage those bad choices cause.
  - natrius 16y ago
    I don't know of any similar tool that would prevent this example.
    - jrockway 16y ago
      I shouldn't be able to see this, as I have no idea who this person is. If she only shared it with her closest friends, the damage would have been more localized.

natrius 16y ago

Yes, I did. I don't see any incriminating posts there. A few are borderline, but they seem to be calling out other people for cheating, not talking about their own escapades. In that case, privacy isn't the point.