4 ms·

No name calling please. I'm very much sane and the furthest thing from a deplorable so to speak. Please tell me we're not ignoring that most terrorism is Musli

No name calling please. I'm very much sane and the furthest thing from a deplorable so to speak. Please tell me we're not ignoring that most terrorism is Muslim affiliated. That, coupled with the fact that there have been many attacks all over the world by Muslim terrorists leads me to ask a simple question, does it then not make sense to ban people from largely Muslim countries until more can be done to thwart these attacks? Should nothing be done according to you? As for that woman, that is an edge case and it can be tolerated for now until travelers on transit can be isolated more carefully in the future. For now, the ban must be employed because more important things are at stake here i.e. security. >How exactly is a woman that is not allowed to exit the terminal >If you want Trump to "be an example for other countries", how should the woman ever get to Costa Rica, considering Costa Rica <-> Iran is probably not popular enough to warrant a direct flight? I would suggest that they be stopped before coming to America in the first place. Let them use another route until authorities can figure out what the hell is going on. America is after all high on extremists' target priority lists. Don't use this small instance of this woman to discredit the entire ban on these 7 nations' emigrants.

danso 10y ago
> Should nothing be done according to you? Not sure if you're aware of this but America has a Department of Homeland Security as well as USCIS, both funded to the tune of billions of dollars to provide screening of the immigration process. There is a lot more than "nothing" that has been done to regulate immigration before Trump's executive order.
- _andromeda_ 10y ago
  Clearly whatever is being done is insufficient and that's why there are attacks by Islamists. As such Trump has decided to be more proactive. He needs more support and accolades for being brave enough to do what's needed even though it is controversial.
  - danso 10y ago
    How many people have died in America due to Islamist attacks since 9/11, nevermind immigrant Islamist attacks?
    - _andromeda_ 10y ago
      What? Why would you even ask that? Do you want America to be like France where because of insufficient immigration controls they get an attack every so often from these Islamic immigrants?
      - danso 10y ago
        Why would I ask that? Because I wonder if you actually know. You said you weren't from America, so I can understand if most of your knowledge about America comes from the news, rather than a view of the facts over a timeframe longer than last week. I mean, to equate America with France, as if geography and economics had nothing to do with immigration, makes me think that you come in with flawed assumptions about how the world works.
        _andromeda_ 10y ago
        >You said you weren't from America, so I can understand if most of your knowledge about America comes from the news, rather than a view of the facts over a timeframe longer than last week. Surely that's a low blow or as Watson might phrase it, a wang bang and you know it. I already said I'm not an American. I do however support Trump. I read many of his books right out of high school and I'm re-reading The Art of the deal. I see a global shift to the right wing going forward. I mean can you believe that in France the Socialist party stands no chance because even the French, yes the French cannot stand what the left has done. I'm glad people from all races have woken up and are saying no to unrestricted immigration, no to excessive taxes and regulation, no to welfare states, and no to egalitarianism. Luckily, this transcends racism. It is about reason as Ayn Rand would put it.
      - dllthomas 10y ago
        > Why would you even ask that? You said, > Clearly whatever is being done is insufficient and that's why there are attacks by Islamists. If, as the parent is hinting, there have been few-to-no attacks by immigrant Islamists (and few attacks by Islamists of any stripe) in the US, I don't see how it's remotely clear that "whatever is being done is insufficient". What the hell does "sufficient" look like? > Do you want America to be like France where because of insufficient immigration controls they get an attack every so often from these Islamic immigrants? Personally? Maybe. If the cost of getting rid of it was zero, then no, of course not. But I choose to bear much higher risks because I don't like the trade-offs necessary to eliminate them. There is no reason this should be different.

danso 10y ago

> Should nothing be done according to you? Not sure if you're aware of this but America has a Department of Homeland Security as well as USCIS, both funded to the tune of billions of dollars to provide screening of the immigration process. There is a lot more than "nothing" that has been done to regulate immigration before Trump's executive order.

_andromeda_ 10y ago
Clearly whatever is being done is insufficient and that's why there are attacks by Islamists. As such Trump has decided to be more proactive. He needs more support and accolades for being brave enough to do what's needed even though it is controversial.
- danso 10y ago
  How many people have died in America due to Islamist attacks since 9/11, nevermind immigrant Islamist attacks?
  - _andromeda_ 10y ago
    What? Why would you even ask that? Do you want America to be like France where because of insufficient immigration controls they get an attack every so often from these Islamic immigrants?
    - danso 10y ago
      Why would I ask that? Because I wonder if you actually know. You said you weren't from America, so I can understand if most of your knowledge about America comes from the news, rather than a view of the facts over a timeframe longer than last week. I mean, to equate America with France, as if geography and economics had nothing to do with immigration, makes me think that you come in with flawed assumptions about how the world works.
      - _andromeda_ 10y ago
        >You said you weren't from America, so I can understand if most of your knowledge about America comes from the news, rather than a view of the facts over a timeframe longer than last week. Surely that's a low blow or as Watson might phrase it, a wang bang and you know it. I already said I'm not an American. I do however support Trump. I read many of his books right out of high school and I'm re-reading The Art of the deal. I see a global shift to the right wing going forward. I mean can you believe that in France the Socialist party stands no chance because even the French, yes the French cannot stand what the left has done. I'm glad people from all races have woken up and are saying no to unrestricted immigration, no to excessive taxes and regulation, no to welfare states, and no to egalitarianism. Luckily, this transcends racism. It is about reason as Ayn Rand would put it.
    - dllthomas 10y ago
      > Why would you even ask that? You said, > Clearly whatever is being done is insufficient and that's why there are attacks by Islamists. If, as the parent is hinting, there have been few-to-no attacks by immigrant Islamists (and few attacks by Islamists of any stripe) in the US, I don't see how it's remotely clear that "whatever is being done is insufficient". What the hell does "sufficient" look like? > Do you want America to be like France where because of insufficient immigration controls they get an attack every so often from these Islamic immigrants? Personally? Maybe. If the cost of getting rid of it was zero, then no, of course not. But I choose to bear much higher risks because I don't like the trade-offs necessary to eliminate them. There is no reason this should be different.