4 ms·
I gave this a shot a few months ago. It was not bad but had many usability and stability problems like unsupported fonts, crashing and some others that I don't
by dallamaneni 10y ago
I gave this a shot a few months ago. It was not bad but had many usability and stability problems like unsupported fonts, crashing and some others that I don't remember now. Terminal is the last thing I expect to crash. Did not find a compelling reason to ditch iTerm2 on Mac and Terminator on Linux.
- halisaurus 10y agoI also gave Hyper a solid go but found the native Terminal and tmux/tmuxinator gives me all the same (worthwhile) utility without some bugs related to pane management and history preservation. With Hyper I regularly experienced history being cleared and lost even in the same pane/window, but I couldn't force replication which made it more frustrating. Also, it has some strange feature (?) that can spawn a browser window inside the terminal but I can never figure out how to escape it. I agree that my terminal shouldn't crash. I handle so many fundamental parts of my workflow in terminal so it has to be stable and efficient.
- Rauchg 10y agoIn terms of crashes, it's amazingly stable. We do have a few bugs with some glyphs still, but please give it a try!
- halisaurus 10y agoI have given it a solid try and I've contributed to the hyperline package. But I've had panes crash/go unresponsive kind of frequently. This isn't to say I won't use it, just that I think I still prefer Terminal. One person's opinion is all. :)
- Rauchg 10y agoWe've made a ton of progress with glyphs that were not displaying properly, and more fixes are coming!