Thing is, what guarantee does your opponent have that you will care about muslims when there is a democrat in the White House? It's like a game theory problem.

Thing is, what guarantee does your opponent have that you will care about muslims when there is a democrat in the White House? It's like a game theory problem. Rhetoric becomes meaningless: there needs to be a track record that shows that you cooperate. That's why hypocrisy is invoked in the debate; rather than an argumentative tool, I see hypocrisy accusations as "flags" that say "I can't cooperate because of your low credibility" If this sounds harsh, I sincerely apologize.