> Any lock that can't be opened from the inside should be illegal as a fire hazard. I'm just pointing out the flaw in that statement taken literally. In theor

> Any lock that can't be opened from the inside should be illegal as a fire hazard. I'm just pointing out the flaw in that statement taken literally. In theory, in the event of a failure, the guards should still be able to open the cells to release people. I wasn't advocating for fail-impossible-to-open-doors.