3 ms·
> This new rule is a violation of the existing contract. The US government down to the municipal level, is not bound by that concept. Ignorance of the law etc
by jack9 10y ago
> This new rule is a violation of the existing contract.
The US government down to the municipal level, is not bound by that concept. Ignorance of the law etc. It's strange how many people are figuring out how screwed up the US system is AFTER they decided they don't like something. It smacks of the same behavior that US politicians engage in. Idiocy married with desperation.
- joatmon-snoo 10y ago> No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Section_9:_Limits_on_Congress https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_Stat... > No State shall [...] pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts [...] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Section_10:_Limits_on_the_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_Stat...
- jack9 10y agoNot a law. SMH - Any more than Regulations are laws. I don't need to explain it to someone who is intentionally trying to misrepresent facts. Good luck.
- Buge 10y agoWhat does ignorance of the law have to do with this? It's a brand new executive order. It's not something that they could have known about in advance.