4 ms·
I absolutely doubt that 'performance' was an important consideration in the acceptance of git. If git took 2x the time to do everything it does today - it stil
by edblarney 10y ago
I absolutely doubt that 'performance' was an important consideration in the acceptance of git.
If git took 2x the time to do everything it does today - it still would have won.
- dllthomas 10y agoI'm not sure. I have vague recollection of pushback against git on Windows in the early days due to poor performance on that platform, which seems to have evaporated since.
- CJefferson 10y agoAlternatives to git weren't taking twice as long, on kernel sized repositories they were taking minutes, instead of fractions of a second.