4 ms·
Your two goals are somewhat in opposition. This is hard enough to achieve with a) non political discussion in b) a small-ish group. It is theoretically possibl
by Mz 10y ago
Your two goals are somewhat in opposition. This is hard enough to achieve with a) non political discussion in b) a small-ish group.
It is theoretically possible, but you would need to take an incredibly hard line about certain kinds of behaviors. Politics tends to actively encourage taking sides (pick your party, pick your candidate, etc), so this would likely remain an uphill battle for all eternity. But there is a lot to be gained by fostering genuinely civil discourse between people with very different views and backgrounds.
I have a long history of promoting the ability for people to share diverse views in online discussion. So, I know how that happens and how to make it happen. I don't do as much of that as I used to, because it makes me a target, benefits other people and seems to mostly bite me in the ass. So, based on personal experience, I will say it can be done, but it is incredibly hard.
- slake 10y agoWhat if the forum had both sides of each argument in parallel? You could contribute to your side and the opposition to their side and the most popular of each side is pushed to the top in a massive split screen?
- Mz 10y agoI have no idea how that would go. It sounds like an interesting experiment, but I don't believe it would promote the sharing of diverse views. As a guess, it would likely promote extreme polarisation in a way that would likely root out nuance more thoroughly than usua!.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]