3 ms·
gmail isn't the only thing that govt services "compete" with. Clinton's self-"secured" email server, for example. In that case, we all would have been better of
by a3n 10y ago
gmail isn't the only thing that govt services "compete" with. Clinton's self-"secured" email server, for example. In that case, we all would have been better off is she had used govt services, for security and for the "sunshine" effect.
- tptacek 10y agoNo, that's also almost certainly false, because at the time she was doing that, unbeknownst to her, the State Department email servers were completely owned up by Russian hackers. Clearly, I'd rather Clinton use GApps than run her own email server. But for security, her worst option was the official servers.
- a3n 10y agoWell put. But I don't remember "State servers owned by hackers" as part of the narrative. Is that "inside baseball," or was that reported? I'd think it would be part of the conversation on the Senate's possible investigations in that area now.
- tptacek 10y agoIt was heavily reported, and it's not unusual: IT security in the USG is a shit-show.