4 ms·
From the article: > So I have seen fair amount of 2 competently different kind of languages. He's speaking of two years of node.js and two years of java. Two
by jimmywanger 10y ago
From the article:
> So I have seen fair amount of 2 competently different kind of languages.
He's speaking of two years of node.js and two years of java. Two years is generally not enough experience in languages to adequately evaluate their prototype potential.
In addition, comparing RoR to Node.js and Java is incorrect. A more accurate comparison would be RoR to Node.js/react or Java/spring, which gives you a lot of the scaffolding and framework and presentation layer which lets you develop more quickly.
- kamalkishor1991 10y agoYes you are right. 2 years is not enough for judging the prototyping potential. Although I have worked with java/spring and I can empirically say it really slow for prototyping. Just wanted to share my first experience with ruby on rails and it is not supposed to be comparison of frameworks.
- jimmywanger 10y ago> it is not supposed to be comparison of frameworks. Well, that's sort of the whole point. The Rails part of Ruby on Rails is the framework, totally apart from Ruby the language. Comparing RoR to plain Node.js where you have to write all the scaffolding for the presentation layer doesn't make any sense. Rails gives you a lot of that for free.