> I'm not at all, that example was pulled at random as an example. Then give me an example of what you are looking for and I will give you a solution > My com

> I'm not at all, that example was pulled at random as an example. Then give me an example of what you are looking for and I will give you a solution > My company certainly likes to do things in a unique way. And every company has a unique way of doing things. That is why they provided all the tools you want and let you combine them to fit your custom needs. Instead, if they were to provide turnkey solutions, you would not use them because you have unique needs. > It isn't like Google is the only company that can build a message queue or a load balancer. Nor are they the only game in town selling them. If there are any better solutions, please let me know. Support is first class on Google Cloud. That is one of the reasons why Spotify choose Google Cloud over AWS. > "Flat rate" does not describe the monstrosity that is that spreadsheet. Google Cloud pricing structure is far easier to work with, as you don't need reservations/upfront payments and at the same time leaves room for scaling up and down elastically. The amount you pay is simply based on usage. For Pub/Sub its the number of messages, for BigQuery its the amount of data that is queried. I would love to see a simpler pricing structure. Would you care to share the details if you know of any?