3 ms·
To my knowladge the Java library does not although it is fully capable of supporting this. I guess this is just an example of poor implementation. It could have
by gravypod 10y ago
To my knowladge the Java library does not although it is fully capable of supporting this. I guess this is just an example of poor implementation. It could have been easily implemented like this
Optional<X> x = ...;
switch (status(x)) {
case SOME: return x.get() * 10;
case NONE: .... send error ...
}
Again I really like the matching functionality but as it stands, since it's not included, it's not worth much without it in my opinion.
With match, that cleans up a LOT of code and if the compiler can guarantee no speed or memory hits for doing this it becomes very valuable very quick.
It's one of the reasons I wanted to learn Rust.
- Sharlin 10y agoIncidentally, Scala discourages using pattern matching in cases like this (pun not intended), preferring the use of combinators (map/flatMap/etc).