It should not be assumed that they were being unlawfully persecuted - rather that there was a serious reason for them to be under investigation It's probably j

It should not be assumed that they were being unlawfully persecuted - rather that there was a serious reason for them to be under investigation It's probably just my own crazy notion, but I think we should assume they're innocent until proven guilty in open court. I also have this other crazy idea that the government should obey the fourth amendment to the constitution (i.e. the highest law in the country), and only conduct reasonable searches with a judicially sanctioned warrant. One based on probable cause and a legally actionable oath/affirmation by the government official seeking the warrant. But I guess reversing the presumption of innocence and pissing on the separation of powers by creating quasi-judiciaries under the executive arm of government is... good...