2 ms·
I read the "In Defense of Homophobes" post. Yeeesh. I guess it's better for that guy to be working in physical science than public policy.
by eavc 16y ago
I read the "In Defense of Homophobes" post.
Yeeesh. I guess it's better for that guy to be working in physical science than public policy.
- gommm 16y agoAh I'm glad I'm not the only one to be horrified by this guy's version of rational thought
- jacobolus 16y agoSeriously. Pretty reprehensible: > “A number of critics have asked if monogamous homosexuals are also culpable. Quite apart from the question of the definition of monogamous (sexual contact with only one person in a lifetime? serial monogamy? some cheating? etc.), I suggest the following analogy: A man joins the Ku Klux Klan. He is not violent, and would never hurt a fly; he just wants a safe place to express his racist feelings. Is he culpable for the Klan's past acts of violence? I believe that even though he is not criminally responsible for acts that occurred before he joined, he is morally culpable for joining the Klan. The Klan has blood on its hands, and anyone who joins must share the guilt. So, too, with the homosexual movement.”