3 ms·
He wants the Constitutional requirement, and the tradition of the separation of powers, to be fulfilled by having a Judge review and sign off on the search. Tha
by voxic11 10y ago
He wants the Constitutional requirement, and the tradition of the separation of powers, to be fulfilled by having a Judge review and sign off on the search. That is all he wants, you are the one imagining insane things.
- dgrealy 10y agoHow you are getting that I want anything different? Also, don't go around calling people insane.
- Steko 10y ago> How you are getting that I want anything different? Then perhaps you're under the misunderstanding that a judge has signed off on the NSL's. That is not the case, these are warrantless searches. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_security_letter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_security_letter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United...
- dgrealy 10y agoGo ahead and downvote me, but NSA has a different process than warrants for a reason. There is signoff which satisfies the constitution. Secret court, secret panel. It is secret for a reason and the court is overseen by congress. However personally I would prefer these cases to be declassified after a reasonalbe amount of time, where it is possible to protect the innocent.
- Steko 10y agoAgain you seem to misunderstand: a NSL is not the NSA going to a secret court, it is the FBI not going to any court.