It is my philosophy all of existence depends on suffering and is directly related to two unique types of causality I call public and private. The old, familiar

It is my philosophy all of existence depends on suffering and is directly related to two unique types of causality I call public and private. The old, familiar public causality occurs along a timeline consisting of observation, discrimination and decision, in that order on the timeline. This can correspond to a computer in the cloud receiving data, computing on the data, and then sending it back out. The "cost" of this causality is observed as a technical limit on the growth of network rates as compared to the growth of compute rates in the market, again over a timeline. These two growth rates, or accelerations, are not equivalent as far as we know or have observed. If private causality is viewed as internal suffering, one could postulate that suffering creates dissonance between the entity doing the rendering of future events and the entities who are involuntarily "caught up" inside that first entity's rendering. For example, I've observed some on the Internet seem very eager to tell others what they think will happen in the future, including how the others "felt" when the "observer" saw them suffering in their own internal rendering of reality. When the observer attempts to make their rendering a reality, such as by telling another entity how it feels, it turns their internal suffering into external suffering, at which point others then experience it directly.