4 ms·
Wouldn't that equate to imprisoning someone but not providing them with food?
by ferongr 10y ago
Wouldn't that equate to imprisoning someone but not providing them with food?
- Arizhel 10y agoIt seems to equate to imprisoning someone in the house of a very poor person who can only afford to feed themselves, and requiring that poor person to provide the prisoner with food, and then punishing the poor person when they refuse.
- spacemanmatt 10y agoDo you prefer to force the mother to feed and host a parasitic child against her will? That's pretty uh...totalitarian.
- komali2 10y agoOr the equivalent of removing life support and having them die slowly and painfully, rather than simply administering an overdose of morphine. I do like that the issues blend at this point, though - removing the placenta is something I haven't considered. It would be legal because you can legally take someone off life support.