If anything, i'd argue that it's incorrect. I first tried `ls -l`, then realized "oh, there could be hidden files so `-l` is not correct. Yet, `ls -la` failed t

If anything, i'd argue that it's incorrect. I first tried `ls -l`, then realized "oh, there could be hidden files so `-l` is not correct. Yet, `ls -la` failed too. To list "all files", you'd need to include hidden right? Well, to be sure, at least.