4 ms·
Why didn't they just keep the news editors they started with? It seems completely rational to keep news editors on staff to run a news service. Think about how
by nxc18 10y ago
Why didn't they just keep the news editors they started with? It seems completely rational to keep news editors on staff to run a news service.
Think about how much in this world would be different if tending news was rebranded rather than replaced with what they ended up putting out.
- camus2 10y ago> Why didn't they just keep the news editors they started with? It seems completely rational to keep news editors on staff to run a news service. I don't think it is that easy to curate the timeline of millions of people. Furthermore, people want to see what they want to see, it sounds stupid but if people were just interested in mainstream media they'd use google news. I don't know a single person that uses google news as a source of news. On the other hand, plenty of people only check news shared by their siblings,relatives,friend network... after all, Facebook is a social network, the ability to share content from the internet is what made it successful against other social networks like MySpace.
- StreamBright 10y agoBecause they were politically biased?
- lawless123 10y agoThat is what InforWars and Brietbart claimed.
- StreamBright 10y agoNope, this is what people said who were on such teams before. http://gizmodo.com/former-facebook-workers-we-routinely-suppressed-conser-1775461006 http://gizmodo.com/former-facebook-workers-we-routinely-supp...