Economic interest, fear (for a threatened ideology), and anger as motives for your aptly labeled "political vandalism" don't seem mutually exclusive. Further mo

Economic interest, fear (for a threatened ideology), and anger as motives for your aptly labeled "political vandalism" don't seem mutually exclusive. Further more I don't think the author was as naive as you think, as he posits that disruption of traditional state vs federal power distributions economic inequity, and ideological claustrophobia, all contribute to a seemingly nation-wide impulse to endorse the political "wrecking ball", i.e., Donald Trump.