4 ms·
Compromised does not have to be destructive intent. It can be nothing but passive intelligence gathering for example. Furthermore, compromised entities are rare
by coretx 10y ago
Compromised does not have to be destructive intent. It can be nothing but passive intelligence gathering for example. Furthermore, compromised entities are rarely compromised by just one entity. For example national intelligence agencies are obligated to monitor new and rising political or activistic activities in order to asses if they are threat or not.This raises the % of compromised entities a lot. And then there is private intelligence & interest groups; same story. Yet in general, I do agree with your conclusions. Often the fear of being compromised is more dangerous than actually being compromised.
- secfirstmd 10y agoThis is true and many NGOs pursue security strategies of "acceptance" or openness in order to deal with this issue. Essentially going along to the policy-maker and telling them what they are doing, which sometimes works to reduce the information gathering operations against them by cutting out the middle layer (intel organisations).