There are many facet to preserving the planet and optimizing food production so the jury is still out. One quick interesting discussion point is that no land c

There are many facet to preserving the planet and optimizing food production so the jury is still out. One quick interesting discussion point is that no land can indefinitely sustain intensive farming and some plot will only ever be able to sustain grazing animals. So let's reduce these constraints for the sake of argument: the world is two field as such. what's more eco friendly? A corn farm and a shrubland, or a forest and a sheep herd?