I think it's worth reading further. He points out managers' preoccupation with morality, then says: "Measures own contribution to society by the extent to which

I think it's worth reading further. He points out managers' preoccupation with morality, then says: "Measures own contribution to society by the extent to which he adds to rules and sees that people live by following rules. Tends to equate rules with morality or the good of society." This is the morality of someone who wants to create the rules which others live by. When I think back to how managers react when someone ignores their rules, a lot of it could have been moral indignation. As if you rejected society's rules. (Which is kind of true, as they're among society's rulemakers.) On the other hand, the hacker "Does not equate rules with morality or the good of society." A different moral view.