3 ms·

Duktape is nice, and I've mentioned it in the article. However it's quite fat, and can't be used on some boards like ESP8266. It's flash footprint is Megabytes,

by drozd 10y ago

Duktape is nice, and I've mentioned it in the article. However it's quite fat, and can't be used on some boards like ESP8266. It's flash footprint is Megabytes, whereas mJS flash footprint is ~25k.

megous 10y ago
Duktape website: "Embeddable, portable, compact: can run on platforms with 192kB flash and 64kB system RAM"
- ricardobeat 10y ago
  Also http://www.esp32.com/viewtopic.php?t=497 http://www.esp32.com/viewtopic.php?t=497
  - drozd 10y ago
    Ah, thanks, wrong about flash footprint. Neil has done a great job adopting Duktape on ESP32.