4 ms·
But if the primary concern of the electorate are cultural changes this is an irrelevant gesture. Now some might say it is racist or xenophobic to want to mainta
by alva 10y ago
But if the primary concern of the electorate are cultural changes this is an irrelevant gesture. Now some might say it is racist or xenophobic to want to maintain the culture of your local community. I don't believe it is.
It is a good example of how the constituents wishes (preserve culture of local community ) is at complete odds with the governments wishes. They can keep on throwing money at them, but it will never address this issue that many people find very important.
- ASinclair 10y ago> Now some might say it is racist or xenophobic to want to maintain the culture of your local community. I don't believe it is. My question: is it a National Government's job to maintain the culture of local communities? I would hope not.
- ConfuciusSay02 10y agoThat makes no sense. If immigration is responsible for changing culture, how could it not be the national government's job? There's more than a few countries that have laws stating that it's essentially treason to modify the demographics of the nation. Seems to have worked quite well for Japan at the national level.