there are lots of people who have a knack for things that don't fall into the traditional Stanford-Binet definition of "gifted". Nor does it account for a pers

there are lots of people who have a knack for things that don't fall into the traditional Stanford-Binet definition of "gifted". Nor does it account for a person who matures in their teens or 20s or beyond. I am also somewhat nervous of bias in the definition of "gifted", which may have things build into it which are correlated with race or culture. Put simply, there are really bright people that the system never catches, at any stage.